Katie Munechika / Dr. Ethel Cesarman - Week 2
This week, we received H1E and H1C knockout cell lines from a collaborator, which were created a few months prior using CRISPR-Cas9. Unfortunately, the majority of the cells were dead, so I have been working on trying to save and expand some of the cells that were still viable. Once these are at a proper viable percentage, I can extract the genomic DNA and sequence them with Sanger sequencing to confirm that they are truly H1E and H1C KO.
Regarding the validation of the V5-tagged H1E cells, we
received a new V5 antibody, so I stripped the western blot membrane and redid
the antibody incubation and imaging. Although the β-actin antibody I used last
week worked, there was some obvious non-specific binding, so I also tried a new
actin antibody to try to reduce that. Sadly, this didn’t work at all and this
time I could not see any bands. It is possible that the membrane was not
stripped well enough to allow the new antibodies to bind. Next week, I plan to
repeat the entire western blot process, starting from lysing the cells.
Hopefully, with a new membrane alongside the new antibodies, it will finally
work.
I have also been helping with another project that is
currently testing effects of two drug treatments on different histone markers
of primary B cells. In order to do this, I have learned how to perform
chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), which consists of fixing and staining the
cells, sorting them by flow cytometry, performing a nuclear extraction, and
then purifying the DNA. Once the DNA has been extracted and purified, we can
perform quantitative PCR.
On the clinical side of things, I had the opportunity to
shadow Dr. Morales, an infectious disease specialist and was able to sit in on
some appointments. One patient had an infection that caused inflammation and
swelling of the toe that began after a tendon-related foot procedure they had undergone.
The inflammation was to the level that it was difficult for them to walk and
they were in constant pain. The patient had tried various different antibiotics
per the recommendation of their podiatrist in the months leading up to this
visit, but the infection persisted, which is the reason they were referred to an
infectious disease specialist. Dr. Morales ordered an MRI to better understand how
deep the infection was, whether it was just in the soft tissue or if it was potentially
in the bone. Dr. Morales also wanted to obtain a deep culture of the infected area
from a podiatrist, based on the imaging results, in order to prescribe a more
specific antibiotic. Since there was no discharge from the infected area, it
was not possible to obtain a proper culture sample at the time of the appointment,
meaning a deep culture was required. I found it particularly interesting to
observe Dr. Morales’ thought process and how they worked with the patient to
try to figure out what may have initially caused the infection, as well as
decide the best next steps for addressing the issue. As an engineer, bedside
manner is not something that I usually think about, but it was very eye-opening
to see how Dr. Morales was sympathetic to the patient (who was clearly
distressed since this condition greatly limited their mobility) and made them
feel understood, while also collecting the necessary information for diagnostic
purposes.
Comments
Post a Comment